FIDE CM Kingscrusher is the webmaster of Chessworld.net
Chessworld.net is a long established online chess site.

If you would like play relaxed, friendly online chess, then

or

And meet other Youtubers or perhaps even play me in a ChessWorld Simul
Support the Kingscrusher Youtube Channel: â–ºSupport via PayPal ($)

 
Chess World Online Chess Forum - When was the last rule change and are there any changers in the pipeline?

Chessworld Forum Topic


Play | Latest posts | IndexForum Name: Chess - General discussion
Forum goals: world chess events, international chess news, puzzles, OTB games
You are currently subscribed to this forum by Email - Click to unsubscribe
If you see anything that you find offensive, please report it to the Helpdesk forum

  Play ... Latest Forum Posts > Chess Forums > Chess - General discussion
  When was the last rule change and are there any changers in the pipeline?




Taotaomonas

Chess rating: 1671





 Topics started


Australia
Give chess goodie
Mon May 7 2018 12:00PM | edited: 1:00:31 | MsgID: 19784483


The threefold repetition rule (if the same position is repeated on 3 consecutive turns, the game is a draw) did not come about until the 1880's. Aside from chess variations the game is one of the few things that has stood the test of time in it's recognised modern form without need for change.

The only argument that I have ever really given any thought to is that of the revealed check in a mating position. I would imagine 99% of chess players myself included do not hold by the argument given purely on the grounds that checkmate is given when the opponents king can make no legal move.

The argument some have come up with is that whilst the game ends there. It is because the king can make no move that would not see it captured on the following move. So, what if one of the pieces administering the check(s) would put its own king in check were it to follow through on actually taking the opponents king? As you cannot make a move that puts your king in check, the premise therefore is that said piece in reality could not carry out the capture so should it not be deemed powerless.

As I said to my mind the game ends a move prior to removal of the king so that is the end of the matter. However I confess I do find it quite an interesting point of view.

Tao







Billdor1967

Chess rating: 1294



 Topics started


United Kingdom
Give chess goodie
Sun May 6 2018 7:18PM | MsgID: 19784465


What rule would you change or add, if you had the power?