FIDE CM Kingscrusher is the webmaster of Chessworld.net
Chessworld.net is a long established online chess site.

If you would like play relaxed, friendly online chess, then

or

And meet other Youtubers or perhaps even play me in a ChessWorld Simul
Support the Kingscrusher Youtube Channel: â–ºSupport via PayPal ($)

 
Chess World Online Chess Forum - A chess literature disjunct

Chessworld Forum Topic


Play | Latest posts | IndexForum Name: Chess - General discussion
Forum goals: world chess events, international chess news, puzzles, OTB games
You are currently subscribed to this forum by Email - Click to unsubscribe
If you see anything that you find offensive, please report it to the Helpdesk forum

  Play ... Latest Forum Posts > Chess Forums > Chess - General discussion
  A chess literature disjunct




R_De_Siota

Chess rating: 1263



 Topics started


United States
Give chess goodie
Thu Jan 7 2016 9:21PM | MsgID: 18765960


Spoken like a true Regina Pokorná fan.







Taotaomonas

Chess rating: 1733





 Topics started


Australia
Give chess goodie
Thu Jan 7 2016 8:56PM | MsgID: 18765917


Cause and effect old chap, Cause and effect.

That is the game







R_De_Siota

Chess rating: 1263



 Topics started


United States
Give chess goodie
Thu Jan 7 2016 4:28PM | MsgID: 18765393


It has been said that when neither player makes a mistake, a game of chess will end in a draw. This would indicate that chess is unwinnable, although it's not unlosable. It seems the best approach would be to focus on making fewer mistakes than one's opponent, while provoking one's opponent into making mistakes. Here is where most chess literature fails. The tactics training exercises and chess puzzles seem to be set up to show how to exploit a mistake that has already occurred instead of how one should cause the mistake to begin with. Are there any books or videos for that?