FIDE CM Kingscrusher is the webmaster of Chessworld.net
Chessworld.net is a long established online chess site.

If you would like play relaxed, friendly online chess, then

or

And meet other Youtubers or perhaps even play me in a ChessWorld Simul
Support the Kingscrusher Youtube Channel: ►Support via PayPal ($)

 
Chess World Online Chess Forum - Wojciechowski vs. Szafarski 2002
Play | Latest posts | IndexForum Name: Chess - General discussion
Forum goals: world chess events, international chess news, puzzles, OTB games
You are currently subscribed to this forum by Email - Click to unsubscribe


Play like the Master | Related Games | Other Commented Games | Bookmark this game




Wojciechowski vs. Szafarski 2002






Chessworld Forum Topic


If you see anything that you find offensive, please report it to the Helpdesk forum

  Play ... Latest Forum Posts > Chess Forums > Chess - General discussion
  Wojciechowski vs. Szafarski 2002




R_De_Siota

Chess rating: 1263



 Topics started


United States
Give chess goodie
Mon Dec 12 2016 7:57PM | MsgID: 19431719


[Quote from: "neilo"]
[Quote from: "retiarius"]Great game! Possibly a loss on time one move away from mate?



It's Black's move now because he/she is in check.
(29) ....... Ke8
(30) Qe7 ++

There's no way that White can lose on time and this is either a serious error on the part of the compiler or White threw the game away for reasons known only to him/herself.

I'm surprised it was allowed if this was any sort of tournament.

😲



You're right, Neil. White could not have possibly lost on time. Perhaps it was black who resigned, and the 0-1 is a misprint. Lord knows I make enough type oh's. 😜







neilo

Chess rating: 1571



 Topics started


United Kingdom
Give chess goodie
Mon Dec 12 2016 6:39PM | MsgID: 19431567


Originally posted by: "retiarius"
Great game! Possibly a loss on time one move away from mate?




It's Black's move now because he/she is in check.
(29) ....... Ke8
(30) Qe7 ++

There's no way that White can lose on time and this is either a serious error on the part of the compiler or White threw the game away for reasons known only to him/herself.

I'm surprised it was allowed if this was any sort of tournament.

😲







R_De_Siota

Chess rating: 1263



 Topics started


United States
Give chess goodie
Sat Dec 10 2016 5:19PM | MsgID: 19427406


A time loss is the only thing that makes sense, unless white didn't need to win the game to win the tourney. But even if that were so, I've yet to meet a chess player so generous. Interesting game!







retiarius

Chess rating: 1757
LCF 161 Fide approx. 2055




 Topics started


United Kingdom
Give chess goodie
Sat Dec 10 2016 3:58PM | MsgID: 19427237


Great game! Possibly a loss on time one move away from mate?







retiarius

Chess rating: 1757
LCF 161 Fide approx. 2055




 Topics started


United Kingdom
Give chess goodie
Sat Dec 10 2016 3:56PM | edited: 4:01:19 | MsgID: 19427231


Deleted post







SHAN67

Chess rating: 1959



 Topics started


United States
Give chess goodie
Sat Dec 10 2016 3:32PM | MsgID: 19427174


This makes no sense

[[[1.e4 e6 2.Nf3 d5 3.Nc3 d4 4.Ne2 c5 5.c3 Nc6 6.cxd4 cxd4 7.Qa4 Bc5 8.b4 Bxb4 9.Nexd4 Nge7 10.Nxc6 Nxc6 11.Bb5 Qd6 12.e5 Qc5 13.a3 Bc3 14.dxc3 Qxc3+ 15.Ke2 Qxa1 16.Bxc6+ Kf8 17.Qb4+ Kg8 18.Rd1 h6 19.Rd8+ Kh7 20.Rxh8+ Kxh8 21.Qf8+ Kh7 22.Be4+ g6 23.Qxf7+ Kh8 24.Qf8+ Kh7 25.Qxh6+ Kg8 26.Qxg6+ Kf8 27.Bh6+ Ke7 28.Qg7+ Kd8 29.Bg5+ 0-1







]]]

Interactive game score

Visit and comment on games in the Master's collection!



Playable game scores in this posting
Playable game #1


<