Shirov: 47...Bh3!!
Topalov versus Shirov, Linares 1998. Black to move sacrifices the bishop from f5 to h3.
8/8/4kpp1/3p1b2/p6P/2B5/6P1/6K1 b - - 0 47
A common modern answer is Shirov's 47...Bh3!! against Topalov in 1998. It is famous because a bishop sacrifice in an endgame transformed a position that looked nearly drawn into a winning king race.
There is no official single most beautiful move. Marshall's 23...Qg3!!, Anderssen's 22.Qf6+!! and other brilliancies can be the right answer if you mean attacking beauty, historical beauty or sacrificial drama.
These diagrams use the site board drawer and FEN strings checked with a Python FEN validator. The arrow marks the beautiful move from the position shown.
Shirov: 47...Bh3!!
Topalov versus Shirov, Linares 1998. Black to move sacrifices the bishop from f5 to h3.
8/8/4kpp1/3p1b2/p6P/2B5/6P1/6K1 b - - 0 47
Shirov: after 47...Bh3!!
The bishop has landed on h3. White now has to face the tempo idea behind the sacrifice.
8/8/4kpp1/3p4/p6P/2B4b/6P1/6K1 w - - 1 48
Marshall: 23...Qg3!!
Levitsky versus Marshall, Breslau 1912. Black to move sends the queen from c3 to g3.
5rk1/pp4pp/4p3/2R3Q1/3n4/2q4r/P1P2PPP/5RK1 b - - 0 23
Anderssen: 22.Qf6+!!
Anderssen versus Kieseritzky, London 1851. White to move gives the queen from f3 to f6.
r1bk2nr/p2p1pNp/n2B4/1p1NP2P/6P1/3P1Q2/P1P1K3/q5b1 w - - 1 22
Choose what kind of beauty you mean, then get the safest move candidate.
Answer eight quick questions about Shirov, Marshall, Anderssen and chess beauty categories.
1. Who played 47...Bh3!!?
2. What is the common modern beautiful-move answer?
3. Which move is linked to Marshall's Gold Coin Game?
4. Which move is Anderssen's Immortal Game queen sacrifice?
5. Is beauty an official ranking?
6. What kind of beauty does 47...Bh3!! show?
7. Is beautiful always the same as best?
8. What should beginners study in beautiful moves?
| Category | Common candidate | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Endgame beauty | Shirov's 47...Bh3!! | A hidden bishop sacrifice wins a king race. |
| Queen-sacrifice beauty | Anderssen's 22.Qf6+!! | A romantic queen sacrifice forces mate. |
| Attacking beauty | Marshall's 23...Qg3!! | The queen can be captured in several ways, all failing. |
| Quiet beauty | Precise non-captures and waiting moves | Beauty can be subtle rather than spectacular. |
| Teaching beauty | Clear forcing sacrifices | The idea is memorable and easy to explain. |
These answers compare Shirov's 47...Bh3!!, Marshall's 23...Qg3!!, Anderssen's queen sacrifice and different forms of chess beauty.
A common modern answer is Shirov's 47...Bh3!! against Topalov in 1998. It is not the only candidate, because chess beauty is subjective.
Shirov's famous beautiful move was 47...Bh3!! against Veselin Topalov at Linares 1998.
It is beautiful because Shirov sacrificed his bishop in an endgame so his king could win a race that looked almost impossible to win.
Alexei Shirov played 47...Bh3!! with Black against Veselin Topalov.
The move 47...Bh3!! was played in 1998 at Linares in the game Topalov versus Shirov.
No official title exists. It is one of the most common answers, especially for endgame beauty and pure imagination.
Marshall's famous Gold Coin move is 23...Qg3!! against Levitsky, a queen move that offered White several ways to take the queen.
It is beautiful because the queen appears to be offered to multiple captures, yet every capture fails tactically.
Anderssen's famous queen sacrifice is 22.Qf6+!! in the Immortal Game, leading to a memorable mating finish.
It is beautiful because White gives up the queen to force mate with remaining minor pieces in a classic romantic attack.
A chess move feels beautiful when it combines surprise, necessity, hidden logic, economy, sacrifice, timing and a memorable final idea.
No. The best move is about objective strength, while the most beautiful move also depends on surprise, elegance and human appreciation.
Yes. Shirov's 47...Bh3!! is famous precisely because an endgame move can be as beautiful as a tactical queen sacrifice.
Yes. Quiet moves can be beautiful when they solve a position with hidden precision instead of obvious force.
Yes. A forced sacrifice can be beautiful when the forcing line is hard to see and the idea is elegant.
Engines can confirm whether a move works, but they do not fully decide beauty. Beauty is partly a human judgement.
Queen sacrifices are dramatic because the queen is the most powerful piece, so giving it up creates immediate tension and surprise.
Underpromotions are beautiful when choosing a lesser piece solves a tactical or stalemate problem that a queen cannot solve.
Beginners often benefit from studying clear sacrifices such as Anderssen's queen sacrifice or Morphy-style developing attacks before very subtle endgame brilliancies.
Shirov's 47...Bh3!! is one of the leading answers for the most beautiful endgame move.
Marshall's 23...Qg3!! and Anderssen's 22.Qf6+!! are common attacking-move candidates.
There is no single famous defensive winner. Defensive beauty usually appears in quiet resources, stalemate tricks, fortress ideas or precise king moves.
The usual answer is 47...Bh3!! from Topalov versus Shirov, Linares 1998.
The usual answer is 23...Qg3!! from Levitsky versus Marshall, sometimes called the Gold Coin Game.
The usual answer is 22.Qf6+!! from the Immortal Game, though Anderssen also has other famous romantic brilliancies.
Beauty is subjective because some players value sacrifice, others value quiet precision, endgame depth, historical fame or practical difficulty.
Beginners should study the pattern and reason behind beautiful moves rather than memorizing the move in isolation.
Look for a move that changes the meaning of the position, solves a hidden problem and seems surprising before the explanation becomes clear.
The common mistake is treating beauty as an official ranking. It is better to name the candidate and explain the beauty category.
The short answer is Shirov's 47...Bh3!! as a common modern choice, with Marshall's 23...Qg3!! and Anderssen's 22.Qf6+!! as classic rivals.
or create a ChessWorld username
Already have an account? Log in