Chess openings are often identified by names rather than codes. These names come from players, places, ideas, or memorable games. Understanding what opening names represent — and what they do not — helps you use them as navigation tools instead of falling into memorisation traps. For a complete overview of opening families and references, see the Chess Openings Guide →
Most opening names originate from history rather than theory. They may refer to a player who popularised an idea, a city where a line was first analysed, or a distinctive strategic concept.
ECO codes categorise openings efficiently, but they are difficult to remember and offer little intuitive meaning. Names provide mental hooks that make exploration and recall easier, especially for human learning.
An opening name does not dictate a fixed sequence of moves. Many openings transpose into each other, and named variations often overlap structurally. Treating names as rigid scripts limits understanding.
Opening names are most useful as gateways. They help you locate example games, understand typical plans, and compare stylistic approaches across different structures.
Some players become emotionally attached to opening names. This can discourage experimentation and honest evaluation. Strong players are flexible — they use names for orientation, not identity.
In A Fun Lover’s Guide to the Major Chess Openings, opening names are used as friendly labels, each supported by illustrative games and commentary. The focus remains on ideas, plans, and enjoyment — not memorisation.