A fork is a tactical attack where a single piece threatens two or more enemy pieces at the same time. Because the opponent can usually respond to only one threat, forks often lead to winning material or delivering decisive checks. The following examples illustrate common fork patterns and how they arise in practical games.
1. Removing flight squares
Piay vs Hidalgo
1. Qh7+
Kf8 2. Nd7+ 1-0 (..,Bxd7 3. Qh8++ or ...,Ke7 3. Nxf6)
2. Minor pieces rule!
Papas vs Oreopoulos
1.Nxd6+
{wins the Q by} 1...Nbxd6 2.Bxd5+ or (1...Nfxd6 2.Bxd5+)
3. Sanchez v Alcaraz
Sanchez vs Alcaraz
1. Rxf7+
Ke6 2. Ng5++ (1...Kxf7 2. Nxd6+) (1...Kd8 2. Nxd6)
4. Recovering material
Janakiev vs Jicman
1...Rxg1+
0-1 (2. Kxg1, Rxc1+ 3. Kf2, Rc2+ etc.)
5. Never resign a won position (2)
Krejcik vs Schwarz
1...Kd5
{black resigned because of the impending knight fork, but in fact white should lose!} 2. Ne7+ Ke4 3. Nxc8 f3+ {the pawn will promote} 4. Kf2 (4.Ke1 Nc2 is strongest 5.Kf1 Nxb4 winning for black) 4...Bh4+ 5. Kg1 f2+ 6. Kh2 f1=Q 0-1
6. Marzolo vs. Langrock
Marzolo vs Langrock
1.a3
wins a piece as 1...Ba5 is answered by 2.Qb3+ forking K and B. {Not, however, 1.Qb3+ Kh8 2.a3 because of the reply 2...Ba6.}
7. Tal vs. Timman
Tal, M vs Timman, J
1.Rxe5
fxe5 2.Ng5 Bf6 3.Nxe6 {and black resigned as further material loss is inevitable e.g. 3...Bxh4 4.Nxc7 and the Re8 is trapped}
8. Anand vs. Adams
Anand vs Adams
1.b5
Nxc3 2.Qd3 g6 3.Bxc3 and white will win either B or N